Welcome to My Website

Best viewed in 1280 x 1024 pixels

A. Riera March, MD

Otolaryngology-Head & Neck Surgery

Any comments or questions regarding this Website, please notify at  ariera@spray.no

 

| INDEX| | Introduction | About me| Presentations| Publications| Publications online | Favorite Medical Links| Review Questions in FPRS & HNS | Case Presentations| History of Medicine| Hippocratic Oath | Software Tools Used|

 

Case Presentation: Buccal Space Mass (Lipoma)

 

 

January 14, 2008

Pictures

Case Presentation: Buccal Space Mass (Lipoma)

 

 

 

 

 

A  51 year-old male patient  has a history of a slow growing mass in the cheek for  18 months. He complains of mild discomfort but not pain.

 

Physical

Examination

 

 

The patient has a mobile mass in his cheek  5 cm x 5 cm approximately. The facial nerve was intact. The work up with CT scanning identify the buccal space mass as a lipoma.

 

 

 

Procedure

 

 

 

Parotid-submandibular incision  was used, with wide undermining of the flap anteriorly to gain adequate exposure of the buccal space.

(Surgery-1  Click here to enlarge the picture)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Procedure

 

Branches of the facial nerve in relation to the lateral aspect of the mass were identified, and retracted gently. The removal of the mass was done by blunt and sharp dissection. A wide bed at the buccal space remains after total excision of the mass. The branches of the facial nerve were returned to the proper position.

 

(Surgery-2  Click here to enlarge the picture)

Pathology

 

 

Lipoma

References for further reading:

 

1) Myers E, N.: Buccal Space Masses, chapter 56 in Operative Otolaryngology  Head an Neck Surgery, (Myers E.N., editor),  Saunders, 1997, pp. 528-533

 

Discussion:  A mass in the buccal space is not common.  The differential diagnosis is extensive, including all tissue related to  the space, such as: glandular, lymphatic, neural, vascular, connective, muscular and inflammatory.

 

There are two types of approaches to the buccal space. 1) Direct approach through the skin over the tumor. 2) Intraoral route

 

The disadvantages of these approaches are: the danger of injury to the facial nerve and the Stensen’s duct, due to the lack of adequate exposure.

 

The parotid-submandibular approach, proposed by Dr. Myers, has the following advantages: 1) Adequate exposure 2) Better exposure, and therefore, proper identification and control over the branches of the facial nerve and Stensen’s duct. 3) Adequate cosmesis with a well camouflaged scar.

 

 

Click below to enlarge the above group of pictures

Enlarge pictures

 

Acknowledgment:

To all of the patients who have taught me so much.

 

To Dr. José Otero for his participation and assistance in the case.

 

Any comments or questions regarding the above,

please notify at  ariera@spray.no

 

 

Back to top

 

Home

 

 

A. Riera March, MD

Copyright © 2003

 

Last revised: January 12, 2008

 

 

 

Case Presentation: Buccal Space Mass (Lipoma)

A. Riera March, M.D.

 

Click the pictures to enlarge its size

 

 

 

 


SURG-1.jpg

                                       
                                        SURG-2.jpg

 

 

Back to the Case Presentation

 

Any comments or questions regarding the above presentation please notify at

ariera@spray.no

 

 

 

Back to top

 

Home